Raymond Larsen v. Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of
the Province of British Columbia et al
Amended SOC ClassA.doc The Larsen v. HMTQ et al
case was filed on behalf of all the boys who were systematically
"sentenced" to spend some or their entire childhood
at an all boys detention facility called Brannan Lake
School for Boys, at Nanaimo, British Columbia between
1946 through 1962. Brannan Lake was not a "school"
but rather, a concentration camp where young boys from
10 to 21 years were detained for being "incorrigible."
These boys were sentenced without fair trial or hearing
to spend time at Brannan Lake where they were systematically
abused sexually, physically and medically by then Superintendent
of Child Welfare, its employees and agents. These boys
were used as slaves, forced to work hard labour contrary
to the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of the
Child and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The Representative Plaintiff, Danny Raymond Larsen was
sentenced to spend his remaining childhood years from
1956 through 1962. In 1961, when he was 20 years old,
Mr. Larsen was sent to Essondale Crease Clinic by then
Superintendent of Child Welfare to be sterilized ("castrated"
--yes--castrated!) as punishment for trying to escape
too many times. Mr. Larsen sues on his own behalf and
on behalf of all the boys who spent time at Brannan Lake
School for Boys. We estimate up to 3000 boys went through
Brannan Lake between 1946 to 1962.
Gavric et al v. Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of
the Province of British Columbia SOCImmigrantSponsors.DOC
The Representative Plaintiffs Daniela Gavric and Malkait
Dosanjh sues on behalf of at least 3,200 immigrant sponsors
who are being subjected to illegal debt collection proceedings
by the Ministry of Provincial Revenue, Collection and
Loan Management Branch and its agents and is named herein
pursuant to the Crown Proceeding Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.
89. The government of British Columbia claims that by
virtue of the "undertaking" signed by the immigrant
sponsors, these sponsors are responsible for all the basic
needs and well-being of the immigrants that were sponsored
by them into Canada for up to 10 years. The government
says that because the sponsored immigrants applied and
were subsequently approved by the Ministry of Human Resources
to receive income assistance, the immigrant sponsors have
breached their undertaking and therefore they must now
pay the government back for what it freely gave to the
sponsored immigrants. The government has embarked on unfair
and intimidating methods of collection such as attaching
liens without any court order on the immigrants' homes
in order to frighten and terrorize them into paying the
collectors. This case involves basic contract law as well
as constitutional issues regarding the rights of the immigrant
sponsors as well as their sponsorees.
On December 24, 2004, some 60 or so immigrants formed
a non-profit society namely, the BC Immigrants Association
for the purpose of defending themselves against the government's
unlawful and unfair debt collection practice. In order
to counter the government's illegal liens attached to
the immigrant sponsor's home, the BC Immigrants Association
with the help of Mr. Dempsey filed a $50 million lien
against the provincial government.
August 4, 2005, a hearing was set by John on behalf of
the Plaintiffs, Danny Raymond Larsen, Daniela Gavric and
Malkait Dosanjh regarding cases: Larsen v. HMTQ and Gavric
et al v. HMTQ. The Law Society of B.C. muscled in and
caused their own Petition against John to be heard. The
law society's motion was set for hearing without consulting
with John first. The law society believes that it can
do anything, even violate ethics and rules of procedure.
They after all control the legal industry. As expected,
the law society came in and trashed John who walked out
of proceeding. John did not participate in the proceeding
as he contended with the judge that neither the law society
nor the judge had jurisdiction over him. The lawyer for
the law society took up most of the day to complete their
villification of John who simply stayed out of the courtroom
as the law society spilled all their garbage. John returned
after the law society finished thrashing him.
Lovey Cridge read John's prepared submissions, emphasizing
the fact that the law society and the court does not have
jurisdiction to infinge upon a human being's unlimited
right of contract. Please see attached submission: http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/ChambersBriefPetition.doc
Due to the law society's interference, the cases, Larsen
v. HMTQ and Gavric et al v. HMTQ were adjourned generally,
pending the court's decision on the law society's Petition
vs. Dempsey. Another setback and delay caused and permitted
by the system.
LAW SOCIETY WAS MIFFED
John's last class action suit, :John-Ruiz: Dempsey on
Behalf of the People of Canada v. The Banks (5 major banks
and 1 credit union) was the last straw for the B.C. Law
Society. They served John with a Petition, on Friday,
April 21, 2005. The petition was filed on April 20, 2005.
The Petition essentially applies to the court for an
order that John be prohibited and enjoined (legal word
for prohibited) from doing these things:
(a) appearing as counsel or advocate -
no problem, John does not appear as counsel or advocate
anyway; he appears as "agent" or "attorney"
- the law society says he cannot use the word "lawyer"
so he won't..
(b) drawing, revising or settling a document for use
in a proceeding, judicial or extra-judicial -
well, John would just have to ask someone else to do
it for him, right? It doesn't matter who does the documents,
as long as it's done properly.
(c) drawing, revising or settling a document for use
in a proceeding in any way to proceedings under the
statutes of Canada or British Columbia -
big deal, John won't do it then, same as above.
(d) doing any act or negotiating in any way for settlement
of, or settling, a claim or demand for damages -
again no big deal, John seldom gets involved in these
sort of stuff anyway as counsel or lawyer, he does it
as collection agent on behalf of people he represents.
(e) giving legal advice - John
never gives legal advice, he gives self-represented
(pro se) litigants instructions and tips about how to
present their own claims, or how to defend themselves
from corrupt lawyers and gives people valuable knowledge
about how corrupt the SYSTEM is based on his own experience
so they know what to watch out for.
(f) offering to provide to a person the legal services
set out in (a) to (e) above -
John does not "offer" his services to anyone.
People come to him because of his reputation as well
as the fact that he does not charge anyone an arm and
a leg for something the litigant could do himself.
(g) holding himself out in any way as being qualified
or entitled to do anything set out in (a) to (f) above
- this is a joke, John always
tells the people he represents all of his limitations
anyway, but he can't deny the fact that he has a law
degree and a degree in criminology. He is more than
qualified to stand toe to toe with the best lawyers
out there. John would not have filed all of these class
actions, particularly the last one - The People vs.
The Banks if he cannot do it. The fact is, he can do
it, and the law society is scared of him and they are
going to try to do everything in their power to stop
him from killing the goose that lays the golden eggs
for them. No one else in the history of Canadian jurisprudence
has anyone done anything like John is doing now.
The law society is also worried about what the other
lawyers are going to say. They are the ones paying the
dues, John is not, so why are they allowing John to "practice
law" without a license? Well simply, there is no
such thing as a "license" to practice law. "License"
is given by the person or the client who ask for the legal
representation. Not one lawyer, at least in the Province
of British Columbia has a "license" to practice
law until the client authorizes the lawyer to represent
him or her. John says he doesn't understand why these
lawyers are so stupid that they have to pay some man-made
corporate Roman body for the privilege of working in their
chosen profession. BAR associations and law societies
are nothing but a legalized protection racket, much like
the mafia or organized crime body. Why should a lawyer
who professes to know the law (or do they?) pay into a
the system that only feeds on them? There are more than
10,000 lawyers in B.C. bowing down and paying tribute
to this man-made creature for what?
There is no such thing as a "license" to "practice
Lawyer Fees Too High? http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/reg20n1c.html
Some lawyers are also worried that John is taking away
some of their business, but this is not true. All of the
cases John takes are cases that nobody wants such as the
hard cases and cases that "normal" lawyers would
be too scared to tackle such as cases against the most
corrupt organizations - the banks and the governments.
A good example of this is the case of Mr. Larsen (Brannan
Lake School for Boys) where Larsen tried for almost 40
years to seek justice for the wrongs done unto him by
the government of British Columbia. Larsen spoke to at
least 100 lawyers, no one wanted to take his case. The
last lawyer who had his file, had it for more than 5 years,
that guy never did anything. John filed a class action
suit two weeks after meeting Mr. Larsen.
What makes the people prefer John is the fact that he
does not put himself above the people who comes to him
for help. Unlike the practicing lawyers who regards their
clients as imbeciles and morons, John treats his people
like he would treat himself. They can call him anytime,
at home, at work, and can ask him questions, and John
does not hesitate to give them answers, not like the lawyers
who charge their clients per minute for every little thing
they do such as talk to them over the phone or in person.
The words billable hours does not exist in his vocabulary.
The law society even hired private investigators to see
if they can trick John into asking for money to perform
legal services. One private investigator reported John
said, "if you win a million bucks, just give me a
thank you note, or some flowers." The investigator
then said, John winked! That was their best evidence that
John is engaged in "unauthorized practice of law"
(whatever that is).
What blows their mind is: how is it possible that John
could provide all these services without expectation of
fee, gain or reward, direct or indirect, from the person
for whom the acts are performed? John says, until these
people learn how to love their fellowman, they will never
understand John's brand of justice. John also says, until
these lawyers experience the hardship of being a victim
of injustice themselves, they will never understand the
true meaning of justice.
THIS IS WHAT THE SYSTEM DOES TO LAWYERS WHO HONESTLY
FIGHT FOR JUSTICE
HAROLD C FUNK TEL (613) 235-0617
205 GLADSTONE AVE ACT 46 FAX (613) 235-5573
THE BEAT ON THE STREET
DEAR HEAD OF NATION MAY 10, 15 BILLION
FOR 17 YEARS I HAVE SENT OUT TO ALL HEADS OF NATIONS
THESE LETTERS IN THE HOPE OF PROMOTING A MEDIATED PEACEFUL
INTERCHANGE BETWEEN AND WITHIN NATIONS. FOR 3+ YEARS THEY
HAVE BEEN PUBLIC.
THE FOLLOWING EVENTS ARE A RESPONSE TO MY PEACE INITIATIVE.
(1) IN 1986 MY HOME IN PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WAS FORECLOSED
AND SOLD WITH A STATEMENT THAT IT WAS SOLD AT AN AUCTION
WHICH WAS A LIE. THERE WAS NO ONE AT THE AUCTION.
(2) I SUED THE LAW SOCIETY OF P.E.I. FOR FAILURE TO GRANT
ME A LICENCE TO PRACTISE LAW ON P.E.I. WHERE I HAD BEEN
REQUESTED TO BRING ACTION AGAINST CORRUPT LAWYERS. I TOOK
THIS ACTION TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. JUDGE LASKIN
MADE LIGHT OF THE CASE. THE PRINCIPLE CASE IN MY LEGAL
BRIEF WAS LATER USED BY THE COURT TO GRANT THE SAME RIGHT
TO ALL CANADIAN LAWYERS TO PRACTICE IN ALL PROVINCES IN
THE BLACK DECISION.
(3) I RETURNED TO ONTARIO TO COMPLETE THE S.C.C. APPEAL
AND CONTINUED MY PRACTICE OF LAW. ONE OF MY FIRST CASES
WAS TO SUE CORRUPT LAWYERS WHO HAD STOLEN MY CLIENTS PROPERTY.
IN DUE COURSE THAT CASE WAS WON AFTER JUDICIAL MANIPULATION.
(4) I TOOK UP THE CASES OF PEOPLE IN PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALS
AND FAMILY COURT CASES. I UNCOVERED ALCOHOL AND DRUG ADDICTED
INCOMPETENCE OF JUDGES AND CIVIL SERVANTS IN BOTH AREAS.
(5) I UNCOVERED JAILED HUMAN GUINEA PIGS BEING USED IN
RITALIN EXPERIMENTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA. LEGAL
AID (THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA) DID EVERYTHING POSSIBLE
AND FINALLY STOPPED MY PROPOSED CLASS ACTION LAW SUIT.
(6) DURING THIS PERIOD I WAS MOVING MY OFFICES AND HAD
PUT MY FURNITURE IN A FRIENDS GARAGE WHERE AN ATTEMPTED
ASSASSINATION TOOK PLACE. (DETAILS PAGE 2 )
(7) SIX MONTHS LATER TWO R.C,M.P. OFFICERS CAME TO MY
OFFICE AND SAID THEY HAD 1 COMPLAINT BY A NATION ABOUT
MY LETTERS TO HEADS OF NATIONS AND ASKED ME TO STOP LETTERS
TO ALL. I REFUSED.
(8) A FEW WEEKS AFTER THIS MY OFFICE WAS BROKEN INTO
AFTER THE R.C.M.P. HAD ASKED THE LOCATION OF MY COMPUTER
AT THAT MEETING AND MY COMPUTER WAS STOLEN.
(9) A FEW WEEKS LATER MY CAR WAS STOLEN FROM MY APARTMENT
AND WAS BROUGHT BACK TO MY APARTMENT TRASHED WITH AN ICE
(10) JUDGE SOUBLIER HAD ORDERED COSTS A YEAR BEFORE OF
$30,000.00 AGAINST ME AND MY CLIENT IN AN ACTION AGAINST
3 CORRUPT LAW FIRMS THAT HAD PARTICIPATED IN THE THEFT
OF APPROXIMATELY $10,000,000.00 FROM MY CLIENT MICHAEL
ACTON BOND.(1 HOUR MOTION)
(11) MOST OF MY WORK WAS FOR THE DISPOSSESSED AND PAID
FOR BY THE LEGAL AID PLAN OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER
CANADA WHOSE FORMER TREASURER WAS JUDGE CHADWICK NOW THE
TOP SUPREME COURT JUDGE IN OTTAWA. HE AND JUDGE CHILCOTT
AND JUDGE CUNNINGHAM MANIPULATED A CASE IN WHICH BRIAN
ROSS WAS KILLED BY AMBULANCE DRIVERS AND POLICE. THE 290
POUND OFFICER PUT HIS KNEE ON MY CLIENTS BACK AND BORE
DOWN WHILE HE WAS HAVING AN EPILEPTIC SEIZURE. DEATH IN
60 SECONDS. THERE WAS NO JUDGEMENT FOR DAMAGES AS THIS
CASE HAD TO BE COVERED UP. AT THE INQUEST THE JURY CAME
TO A DECISION: THE DOCTOR JUDGE READ IT AND TOLD THE JURY
TO CHANGE IT BECAUSE SHE DID NOT LIKE IT. SHE TOLD THEM
TO FIND THAT MY CLIENT DIED AS A RESULT OF HIS STRUGGLING
WHILE THE 290 POUND OFFICER PUT ALL HIS WEIGHT ON HIS
BACK WHILE UNDER A SEIZURE. MEDICAL AND GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION
(12) ONE OF THE LAW FIRMS USED THE COST DEBT OF $30,000.00
TO CLAIM PAYMENT FROM LEGAL AID. MY FUNDS WERE SEIZED
BY THE LAW SOCIETY. THIS PRECIPITATED MY BANKRUPTCY AND
A HEART ATTACK.
(13) THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA WAS DISBARRING ME
FOR FAILURE TO MAKE MY ANNUAL REPORT ON MY TRUST ACCOUNT.
I HAD NO FUNDS OF CLIENTS IN MY TRUST ACCOUNT AND NO ACTION
HAS EVER BEEN TAKEN BY A CLIENT FOR TRUST ACCOUNT FUNDS.
I DID NOT DEFEND THIS ACTION AS I NO LONGER WANTED TO
BE A MEMBER OF A CORRUPT LAW SOCIETY. I WAS DISBARRED:
MY STATEMENT OF THAT CORRUPTION.
(14) ONE OF MY CLIENTS LAURIER HEBERT WAS LOSING HIS
400 ACRES OF LAND THAT HAD GRAVEL ON IT WORTH $400,000,000.00.
THE LAW SOCIETY WAS A DEFENDANT AND THEIR SOLICITORS DID
EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO NOT ALLOW ME DISCLOSURE OF ALL
FILES. AFTER I WAS DISBARRED HE LOST HIS CASE AND WAS
DRIVEN INTO BANKRUPTCY BY THE JUDGES- LAWYERS AND LAW
SOCIETY. JUST LIKE ME. THE LAW SOCIETY GOT OUT OF THEIR
$ 400,000,000.00 LEGAL LIABILITY.(FILE 594/82) (BANKRUPTCY
(14) MY ATTEMPTED ASSASSINATION IS SET FORTH IN AN AFFIDAVIT
SWORN BY RAMESH MISHRA- A LAWYER- IN HIS APPLICATION NO
25489SCC FOR RECONSIDERATION OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE
TO APPEAL FILED IN 1997 AND REFUSED AND NOW REQUESTED
AGAIN WITH THIS NEW AFFIDAVIT EVIDENCE- 72 PARAGRAPHS
OF JUDICIAL, POLICE- AND PROVINCIAL AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
MURDERS AND CORRUPTION THAT THE REGIONAL POLICE OF OTTAWA
CARLTON REFUSE TO INVESTIGATE AS THEY ARE ONE WITH THE
MURDERERS AND CORRUPT OFFICIALS. PARAGRAPHS 23,24,25,26
SETS FORTH THAT MR THEMBI ORISHA BY HIS ADMISSION A SECRET
AMERICAN AGENT WAS BROUGHT INTO CANADA FOR THE PURPOSE
OF BURNING DOWN THE BUILDING WHERE MY OFFICE FURNITURE
WAS IN THE GARAGE AND MURDERING ME. TWO ABORIGINAL PEOPLE
WERE BADLY INJURED AND NEVER RECEIVED ANY COMPENSATION
FOR THEIR SERIOUS BURN INJURIES AT 99 ARLINGTON AVE OTTAWA.(PARA
25) MR ORISHA WAS BROUGHT FROM THE U.S.A. BY THE CITY
OF OTTAWA, PIAZZA, I. BALDELLI ASSISTANT CITY SOLICITOR,
NELLIGAN POWER THE LAWYERS FOR THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER
CANADA AND JUDGES OF THE ONTARIO COURT GENERAL DIVISION
JUDGE CHADWICK AND JUDGE CHILCOTT. (JUDGES TARGETED MY
CLIENTS WITH LOSS OF THEIR CASES)
MR THEMBI ORISHA GOT HIS ASSASSINATION INSTRUCTIONS (PARA
24) ON 5 AUGUST 1994 FROM THE CITY OF OTTAWA, THE OTTAWA
POLICE, ROYAL TRUST CORPORATION (NOW ROYAL BANK OF CANADA),
ROD MORAN AND THE LAW FIRM OF NELLIGAN POWER THE SOLICITORS
FOR THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA. MURDER FUNK AND DESTROY
HIS RECORDS. THE R.C.M.P. AS STATED LATER STOLE MY COMPUTER
TO GET MY RECORDS. MIKE SABOURIN WHO WAS AN EYE WITNESS
TO ORISHA SETTING THE FIRE WAS MURDERED BY THESE AUTHORITIES
AND DUMPED IN THE RIVER.
ORISHA WAS PROMISED LANDED IMMIGRANT STATUS IN CANADA
FOR MY ASSASSINATION. (PARA 25) MR ORISHA WAS DEPORTED
BACK TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION
WHO SHOULD HAVE LAID CHARGES OF ATTEMPTED ASSASSINATION
AND MURDER ON ALL THE INDIVIDUALS SET FORTH IN THIS AFFIDAVIT.
Supreme Court 'absolutely corrupt': prof http://www.theinterim.com/2004/mar/22supreme.html
Holodeck Law - Litigation Vortex
Links to 'What's Happening' Within the [In] Justice System:
The People vs The Banks: http://www.canadanewswire.com/en/releases/archive/August2005/24/c2716.html
Federal Crown Prosecutor charged with conspiring to obstruct
justice : http://www.law.avva.ca/crown.htm
Mr. Anthony Gavrielides conveys to the Saskatchewan Law
Society : http://www.law.avva.ca/tonyg.htm
More bad lawyers are stealing more money from their clients:
Ontario Government: Contempt of Ontario Appeal Court
Ruling : http://www.law.avva.ca/Sun/tickets.htm
Connie Brauer and Vic Harris Petition : http://www.petitiononline.com/free9104/petition.html
Former B.C. lawyer arrested in U.S. :http://www.cbc.ca/404.html?filename=bc_lawyer20040904
Pair Stake Massive 900 Billion Lawsuit : http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/OttawaSun/News/2004/07/25/555983.html
Court jester : http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/Columnists/Calgary/Link_Byfield/2004/06/24/512890.html
Courts are in a complete mess : http://www.law.avva.ca/courts.htm
Alta. MLA refuses to explain apparent non-payment of
child support : c
Quennell under fire for letter :c
Hall of Shame : http://www.wantedposters.com/orangeville.htm
Other Related Sites:
Injustice Busters : http://www.injusticebusters.com/
Better Justice Bureau : http://www.betterjusticebureau.com/
Dirty Lawyer : http://www.dirtylawyer.com/
Star Chamber Proceedings : http://starchamberproceedings.blogspot.com/
Democracy Watch : http://www.dwatch.ca/
Overlawyered : http://www.overlawyered.com/archives/cat_canada.html
Canada Law Courts : http://canadalawcourts.com/